Hi CareCure,
Been a while since I posted. I identify as a T-5 paraplegic, 18 years post, incomplete. But I have recovered a lot of function, enough that I walk with a cane or walker. Generally, in the absence of those things, I can get around by lurching somewhat.
I was told by a physical therapist that because I recovered enough to walk I should start referring to my condition as paraparesis, not paraplegia. Is this true? Should paraplegics who regain the requisite function classify themselves as having paraparesis? (is paraparetic a word)? While I don't want to claim I am something I am not, I also know that not many people know the word paraparesis.
Thanks,
Dave
Been a while since I posted. I identify as a T-5 paraplegic, 18 years post, incomplete. But I have recovered a lot of function, enough that I walk with a cane or walker. Generally, in the absence of those things, I can get around by lurching somewhat.
I was told by a physical therapist that because I recovered enough to walk I should start referring to my condition as paraparesis, not paraplegia. Is this true? Should paraplegics who regain the requisite function classify themselves as having paraparesis? (is paraparetic a word)? While I don't want to claim I am something I am not, I also know that not many people know the word paraparesis.
Thanks,
Dave
Comment