I think Acid's comment's are so concise and relevant that I have combined a few of his latest here so that we can all scroll through them again to get back on topic.
But maybe somewhen the censorer idiot will get, autistic repetitive warning loops, about that this Chinese man might be sorts of crippling various in 1-4 persons a day or so, here regarded significant enough,
isn't for me turning "insignificant", just because WY regards it so.
Yeah. WY.
Seemed to amount to, after censoring writing to Dr. Huang,
WY informing me, there is for who wishs to write to Dr.Huang.
Aha.
Up WY's. Along with his "insignificant".
I had made warnings. He censored them out. Blabbing "insignificant".
And me doing the long version of, about as insignificant
as crippling natural latent partial SCI healing options.
It befitting to WY's CC Cure Censoring patterings,
to treat this insignificant.
Censoring warnings.
posted Jan 05, 2004 07:32 PM
I wondered before OP how far it'd go with Cjo's. I mean if instead the self there were differing.
Just some years various not going, ain't impress me much, if latent partial healing capacities register with someone with SCI just as "short" a time as he had. CR had his SCI years so not much seemed to be going,
and of late seems to be at pushing with his legs from a swimming pool rim, or something like that.
Cjo's left by far didn't register as high as CR's right.
But seemed to score second highest with the pics I played around with.
CR got without any E-OEG ways further in sorts of recovery degrees, than quite a number with E-OEG seem to have to.
Natural healing potentials seemed to me on this site often alike belittled.
A bunch of WY's, for example, read like, stick in this, contra stick in that.
However usually not one word about how to activate and steer along with natural partial healing potentials.
If some madheads here pretend, because they believe so, therefore it can't be, Huang's OP messed into natural healing options potentials,
to me this seems partially more alike illusionaries trying to cling to some straw of hope. Beyond being willing to check if there might be anything to danger warnings.
From my perspective they can do their US American "ignore" and aggression and censorer politics a long time.
It will not change, that mine registered something to do with cellular defense contra Cjo's.
And that the "aliens" with their defense potentials contra Cjo's cells
are in an area also, where in Cjo's SCI registered the highest latent healing potentials of the SCI.
The left lower SCI.
It can be pretended here from morning till evening, that nothing in Cjo's natural healing options changed.
Also, that it's just chance, brain stem stuff I found important for if one wanted to heal there, after OP never registered so again as an option.
(Various else also not going as before.)
I find more interesting,
than all the pretendings here, E-OEG can't disturb anything in latent natural partial options,
the question, how far without the olfactory "aliens" in his spine,
could the left SCI there have recovered?
With them in, what I regarded among the most important programmer options for healing seems too disabled. Would have needed brain stem interreactions for this to still be maintained as latent options,
so brainstem systems can regulate into the SCI,
and not this weirdo stuff in spine, for which brain stem programs are plain not by nature set, that this is there.
Too unnatural.
And WY, no trying to swipe under the e-carpet
my warnings about natural programs disablings and cellular defense,
in the usual WY CC Cure Censoring style,
changes, that you didn't research in Cjo's about this.
Nor, that if I'm right,
it might be committed again by Huang, maybe without any warnings to people about this, who still got quite some latent healing capacities left in SCI,
that might get sorts of crippled.
But one might assume, that this is what you are trying to reach:
That this procedure is still done into many.
Without any Caring, the usual WY Cure
censorer style,
if it will sorts of cripple into natural partial intra-SCI cure options.
Belief,
that it won't,
scored higher, than caring to bother,
what, if what I got in there, in such patterings DIFFERENCES since that OP,
has from this OP E-OEG as a cause,
and NOT something here.
It seeming treated alike fact, that such differences after this OP,
have to have the cause here,
and the cause not being, that E-OEG went into these systems.
Just incidental, in months before stuff went, as afterwards not again ever so.
Nothing whatsoever to do with this OP between.
Sarcasm.
And though many here might pretend,
without any checking about Cjo's before and afterwards,
that it's impossible, the olfactory "aliens"
have had cellular defense active contra Cjo's,
and are so bizarre and unnatural in spine to be,
that it disabled natural interrelay options into SCI systems from the brain stem,
important for activating latent partial healing potentials in the left SCI,
this belief does not prove anything.
It does not replace any study,
of tuning into the brain stem of someone with similar C SCI as Cjo's left
(meaning not the hight or side,
but that it was not damaged as the other side,
and here registering partial latent healing potentials, particularily in the lower SCI)
& translinking energies from the brain stem into the SCI,
and study about how much one can shift it towards brain stem as central regulator control into the SCI.
Also alike activity amounts, how easy it goes, etc.
And after OP, maybe 10 days later or so,
repeating this procedure.
To compare, if it's really going in no form more hindered, compared to before.
I assume if several people independent were to do the study,
particularily with people with SCI, where as to me with Cjo's left registered there are partial latent healing potentials of quite some significance,
one could compare their results.
If they are independently of each other state the same.
Alike, if 4-10 people all say, nothing noticed differing here with this person.
Or if all say, there's a bunch no longer going as before.
Without any study into this,
it can be claimed here from morning till evening, that nothing changed in Cjo's to the negative with such.
And that it's impossible, Huang's OPs might have caused such, and might again and again in the future cause such in similar cases.
However just claiming it's impossible,
is in no form replacing any research into this.
I might as well ram a bunch of wires through someone's leg, and if some electricity goes through, claim nothing of significance was damaged in this leg.
This however does not prove, that really nothing of significance was damaged in this leg.
And if I were to censor out the opinion of someone, it did cause damages to the leg,
me claiming, no, because electricity goes through the wires, therefore it didn't cause damages to the leg,
this is a mix of illogical,
and not counter-proving the other's claim.
and not counter-proving the other's claim.
Posts: 1789 | From: Berlin | Registered: 12-04-02
Acid
Member
posted Jan 05, 2004 04:08 PM
Actually, this site scores among rock bottom sites, where it comes to danger warnings,
and censoring them out.
Where DHEA was made out alike something OK to stick into the "dietary" whatever, I warned, this stuff is not the most harmless,
to stick into the diatary whatever.
This warning was censored out again and again on this site.
Till I bothered to get me from the internet warnings against cancer dangers and other dangers.
Was it this site, who censored warnings contra Prozac, context killing?
If so, this site scored about as many negative gigapoints, as persons in context with Prozac warping into brain programs did kill.
(I read estimates ranging from ways over a thousand to many thousand death cases.)
I recall also censoring of warnings against various drug attacks into brain systems, that these might cause damages.
Actually, this is sure a difference of this site to what I'm used to from Berlin.
When I was younger, I dangled in about 10m hight at a building scaffold from one arm, for the mere adrenaline kick. Other times was on something high, where one step the wrong direction would have landed with falling dozens of meters.
I had it I warned someone food that for me would be OK might not for her, and she ate it anyway, and while I had no problems, she still had a greenish tinge next day in the face.
And I took drugs where many make alike an arch around these.
If I start to point out, there seem some dangers to something, I'm used to in Berlin being taken quite serious on this.
And not, that cancer danger warnings, death danger warnings, drug damage warnings, systems damage warnings, etc.,
are treated alike totally insignificant, and being censored off.
and not counter-proving the other's claim.
Posts: 1789 | From: Berlin | Registered: 12-04-02
Acid
Member
posted Jan 05, 2004 04:08 PM
Actually, this site scores among rock bottom sites, where it comes to danger warnings,
and censoring them out.
Where DHEA was made out alike something OK to stick into the "dietary" whatever, I warned, this stuff is not the most harmless,
to stick into the diatary whatever.
This warning was censored out again and again on this site.
Till I bothered to get me from the internet warnings against cancer dangers and other dangers.
Was it this site, who censored warnings contra Prozac, context killing?
If so, this site scored about as many negative gigapoints, as persons in context with Prozac warping into brain programs did kill.
(I read estimates ranging from ways over a thousand to many thousand death cases.)
I recall also censoring of warnings against various drug attacks into brain systems, that these might cause damages.
Actually, this is sure a difference of this site to what I'm used to from Berlin.
When I was younger, I dangled in about 10m hight at a building scaffold from one arm, for the mere adrenaline kick. Other times was on something high, where one step the wrong direction would have landed with falling dozens of meters.
I had it I warned someone food that for me would be OK might not for her, and she ate it anyway, and while I had no problems, she still had a greenish tinge next day in the face.
And I took drugs where many make alike an arch around these.
If I start to point out, there seem some dangers to something, I'm used to in Berlin being taken quite serious on this.
And not, that cancer danger warnings, death danger warnings, drug damage warnings, systems damage warnings, etc.,
are treated alike totally insignificant, and being censored off.
and not counter-proving the other's claim.
Posts: 1789 | From: Berlin | Registered: 12-04-02
Acid
Member
posted Jan 05, 2004 04:08 PM
Actually, this site scores among rock bottom sites, where it comes to danger warnings,
and censoring them out.
Where DHEA was made out alike something OK to stick into the "dietary" whatever, I warned, this stuff is not the most harmless,
to stick into the diatary whatever.
This warning was censored out again and again on this site.
Till I bothered to get me from the internet warnings against cancer dangers and other dangers.
Was it this site, who censored warnings contra Prozac, context killing?
If so, this site scored about as many negative gigapoints, as persons in context with Prozac warping into brain programs did kill.
(I read estimates ranging from ways over a thousand to many thousand death cases.)
I recall also censoring of warnings against various drug attacks into brain systems, that these might cause damages.
Actually, this is sure a difference of this site to what I'm used to from Berlin.
When I was younger, I dangled in about 10m hight at a building scaffold from one arm, for the mere adrenaline kick. Other times was on something high, where one step the wrong direction would have landed with falling dozens of meters.
I had it I warned someone food that for me would be OK might not for her, and she ate it anyway, and while I had no problems, she still had a greenish tinge next day in the face.
And I took drugs where many make alike an arch around these.
If I start to point out, there seem some dangers to something, I'm used to in Berlin being taken quite serious on this.
And not, that cancer danger warnings, death danger warnings, drug damage warnings, systems damage warnings, etc.,
are treated alike totally insignificant, and being censored off.
WY, YOU after all your ... into my direction, are just about the right one to teach about respect.
Apart from that I was originally writing towards Dr. Huang,
in case over all this censoring this was forgotten.
And after something I wrote to him (and not to some US American) someone asked "huh?"
I tried to explain simpler form, what I had written in response.
Next Morgan ranted off, and then came back some from me.
And there it drifted off.
This however does not change, that origincally it were concerns to do with that I believe with SCI sectors with still quite some latent healing potentials in them, E-OEG I think might disturb too far by their unnaturalness in systems, and hinder interreaction options from other systems into the damaged systems and majorly important repair programs.
And, though that was also censored out, as with CR seems obvious, sorts of repair might still start in time later, than the time where Cjo had this OP.
And in CR's case seemed to go further, than with E-OEG seemed to be that customary.
Who censored my opinions on this out, anyway?
You? In your usual style of not disproving in any form, in this case that E-OEG seem to hinder interphasings from medulla into SCI as seems important with latent healing capacities still left?
What makes you so sure, anyway, there were no latent healing capacities in Cjo's lower left SCI for example.
For my registration here, there were even several differing sorts.
Alike free selection, if preferring here from the self down aiming and upwards in, or from the brain stem down into there,
or from the self for an off-branch sorts of lower in there,
and trying to tune around for this one,
which also seemed to have some latent healing potentials ...
That's among what made Cjo's left in pic games entertaining to play around my tuning games and study various my ways about what interested me.
And whatever you ACID around, you have not proven me yet so far with all your censoring, that my opinions on something are incorrect.
And not just on this.
Maybe somewhen count, how many of my theories and opinions censored out
were not proven incorrect.
(Might that even be 100%? Anyway, the vast majority.)
You made it very long ago clear, that you censor based on belief ideology.
And not based on proven facts, that disprove my theories.
Also in this case, I saw no proof, that E-OEG can't have, like I commented, sorts of cellular defense systems active against the host, and can't be in any form, like I commented, in the way of natural programs interreaction options with C systems.
It is treated, when I warn Dr. Huang, it seems wrong to have done this procedure with Cjo's left SCI, and I assume generally with SCI this "young" and seeming to still have quite some latent partial healing capacities,
some "censorer object".
Why do you even pretend this is to address him.
That is the hight, to censor out writing of mine to him,
to next inform me, this site was for writing to him.
Hey, I tell what I think of your respect ideals in my direction:
I mentally spit on them.
A dictator Cure Censorer as you with your bloated arrogance,
rather risk "ignoring" it might not be just something here,
that since that OP a whole load of systems of mine cannot any longer activate patterings within such games after OP as before.
And among IMO such as I regarded among the most important,
if Cjo had been instead of my enemy my pal at the time,
as I'd have needed brain base natural interreactions options intact
that it can go for into the left SCI for this.
And yeah, you Contra Cure dude,
with your Cure Censoring,
can try to hide a long time, this alien cellular stuff with its defense systems is not in the way of natural healing options,
or that Cjo didn't have in there partial latent healing options before,
or that these olfactory whatevers are ever so natural to be in spine,
as not to disturb any natural programs options of interphasings into the C.
Try to hide it.
Censoring out my warnings to Dr. Huang,
and trying to hush it up what's not befitting your "discussion" ideals,
as if something written to Dr.Huang,
instead had in the headline, it was to you,
you Cure Censorer,
just befits you.
{IMO you and your site are outright dangerous for humans.
Having texts about differing potentially systems damaging methods,
and again and again censoring warnings contra dangers.
Potentially destructive attitudes disguised behind CC.)
But maybe somewhen the censorer idiot will get, autistic repetitive warning loops, about that this Chinese man might be sorts of crippling various in 1-4 persons a day or so, here regarded significant enough,
isn't for me turning "insignificant", just because WY regards it so.
Yeah. WY.
Seemed to amount to, after censoring writing to Dr. Huang,
WY informing me, there is for who wishs to write to Dr.Huang.
Aha.
Up WY's. Along with his "insignificant".
I had made warnings. He censored them out. Blabbing "insignificant".
And me doing the long version of, about as insignificant
as crippling natural latent partial SCI healing options.
It befitting to WY's CC Cure Censoring patterings,
to treat this insignificant.
Censoring warnings.
posted Jan 05, 2004 07:32 PM
I wondered before OP how far it'd go with Cjo's. I mean if instead the self there were differing.
Just some years various not going, ain't impress me much, if latent partial healing capacities register with someone with SCI just as "short" a time as he had. CR had his SCI years so not much seemed to be going,
and of late seems to be at pushing with his legs from a swimming pool rim, or something like that.
Cjo's left by far didn't register as high as CR's right.
But seemed to score second highest with the pics I played around with.
CR got without any E-OEG ways further in sorts of recovery degrees, than quite a number with E-OEG seem to have to.
Natural healing potentials seemed to me on this site often alike belittled.
A bunch of WY's, for example, read like, stick in this, contra stick in that.
However usually not one word about how to activate and steer along with natural partial healing potentials.
If some madheads here pretend, because they believe so, therefore it can't be, Huang's OP messed into natural healing options potentials,
to me this seems partially more alike illusionaries trying to cling to some straw of hope. Beyond being willing to check if there might be anything to danger warnings.
From my perspective they can do their US American "ignore" and aggression and censorer politics a long time.
It will not change, that mine registered something to do with cellular defense contra Cjo's.
And that the "aliens" with their defense potentials contra Cjo's cells
are in an area also, where in Cjo's SCI registered the highest latent healing potentials of the SCI.
The left lower SCI.
It can be pretended here from morning till evening, that nothing in Cjo's natural healing options changed.
Also, that it's just chance, brain stem stuff I found important for if one wanted to heal there, after OP never registered so again as an option.
(Various else also not going as before.)
I find more interesting,
than all the pretendings here, E-OEG can't disturb anything in latent natural partial options,
the question, how far without the olfactory "aliens" in his spine,
could the left SCI there have recovered?
With them in, what I regarded among the most important programmer options for healing seems too disabled. Would have needed brain stem interreactions for this to still be maintained as latent options,
so brainstem systems can regulate into the SCI,
and not this weirdo stuff in spine, for which brain stem programs are plain not by nature set, that this is there.
Too unnatural.
And WY, no trying to swipe under the e-carpet
my warnings about natural programs disablings and cellular defense,
in the usual WY CC Cure Censoring style,
changes, that you didn't research in Cjo's about this.
Nor, that if I'm right,
it might be committed again by Huang, maybe without any warnings to people about this, who still got quite some latent healing capacities left in SCI,
that might get sorts of crippled.
But one might assume, that this is what you are trying to reach:
That this procedure is still done into many.
Without any Caring, the usual WY Cure
censorer style,
if it will sorts of cripple into natural partial intra-SCI cure options.
Belief,
that it won't,
scored higher, than caring to bother,
what, if what I got in there, in such patterings DIFFERENCES since that OP,
has from this OP E-OEG as a cause,
and NOT something here.
It seeming treated alike fact, that such differences after this OP,
have to have the cause here,
and the cause not being, that E-OEG went into these systems.
Just incidental, in months before stuff went, as afterwards not again ever so.
Nothing whatsoever to do with this OP between.
Sarcasm.
And though many here might pretend,
without any checking about Cjo's before and afterwards,
that it's impossible, the olfactory "aliens"
have had cellular defense active contra Cjo's,
and are so bizarre and unnatural in spine to be,
that it disabled natural interrelay options into SCI systems from the brain stem,
important for activating latent partial healing potentials in the left SCI,
this belief does not prove anything.
It does not replace any study,
of tuning into the brain stem of someone with similar C SCI as Cjo's left
(meaning not the hight or side,
but that it was not damaged as the other side,
and here registering partial latent healing potentials, particularily in the lower SCI)
& translinking energies from the brain stem into the SCI,
and study about how much one can shift it towards brain stem as central regulator control into the SCI.
Also alike activity amounts, how easy it goes, etc.
And after OP, maybe 10 days later or so,
repeating this procedure.
To compare, if it's really going in no form more hindered, compared to before.
I assume if several people independent were to do the study,
particularily with people with SCI, where as to me with Cjo's left registered there are partial latent healing potentials of quite some significance,
one could compare their results.
If they are independently of each other state the same.
Alike, if 4-10 people all say, nothing noticed differing here with this person.
Or if all say, there's a bunch no longer going as before.
Without any study into this,
it can be claimed here from morning till evening, that nothing changed in Cjo's to the negative with such.
And that it's impossible, Huang's OPs might have caused such, and might again and again in the future cause such in similar cases.
However just claiming it's impossible,
is in no form replacing any research into this.
I might as well ram a bunch of wires through someone's leg, and if some electricity goes through, claim nothing of significance was damaged in this leg.
This however does not prove, that really nothing of significance was damaged in this leg.
And if I were to censor out the opinion of someone, it did cause damages to the leg,
me claiming, no, because electricity goes through the wires, therefore it didn't cause damages to the leg,
this is a mix of illogical,
and not counter-proving the other's claim.
and not counter-proving the other's claim.
Posts: 1789 | From: Berlin | Registered: 12-04-02
Acid
Member
posted Jan 05, 2004 04:08 PM
Actually, this site scores among rock bottom sites, where it comes to danger warnings,
and censoring them out.
Where DHEA was made out alike something OK to stick into the "dietary" whatever, I warned, this stuff is not the most harmless,
to stick into the diatary whatever.
This warning was censored out again and again on this site.
Till I bothered to get me from the internet warnings against cancer dangers and other dangers.
Was it this site, who censored warnings contra Prozac, context killing?
If so, this site scored about as many negative gigapoints, as persons in context with Prozac warping into brain programs did kill.
(I read estimates ranging from ways over a thousand to many thousand death cases.)
I recall also censoring of warnings against various drug attacks into brain systems, that these might cause damages.
Actually, this is sure a difference of this site to what I'm used to from Berlin.
When I was younger, I dangled in about 10m hight at a building scaffold from one arm, for the mere adrenaline kick. Other times was on something high, where one step the wrong direction would have landed with falling dozens of meters.
I had it I warned someone food that for me would be OK might not for her, and she ate it anyway, and while I had no problems, she still had a greenish tinge next day in the face.
And I took drugs where many make alike an arch around these.
If I start to point out, there seem some dangers to something, I'm used to in Berlin being taken quite serious on this.
And not, that cancer danger warnings, death danger warnings, drug damage warnings, systems damage warnings, etc.,
are treated alike totally insignificant, and being censored off.
and not counter-proving the other's claim.
Posts: 1789 | From: Berlin | Registered: 12-04-02
Acid
Member
posted Jan 05, 2004 04:08 PM
Actually, this site scores among rock bottom sites, where it comes to danger warnings,
and censoring them out.
Where DHEA was made out alike something OK to stick into the "dietary" whatever, I warned, this stuff is not the most harmless,
to stick into the diatary whatever.
This warning was censored out again and again on this site.
Till I bothered to get me from the internet warnings against cancer dangers and other dangers.
Was it this site, who censored warnings contra Prozac, context killing?
If so, this site scored about as many negative gigapoints, as persons in context with Prozac warping into brain programs did kill.
(I read estimates ranging from ways over a thousand to many thousand death cases.)
I recall also censoring of warnings against various drug attacks into brain systems, that these might cause damages.
Actually, this is sure a difference of this site to what I'm used to from Berlin.
When I was younger, I dangled in about 10m hight at a building scaffold from one arm, for the mere adrenaline kick. Other times was on something high, where one step the wrong direction would have landed with falling dozens of meters.
I had it I warned someone food that for me would be OK might not for her, and she ate it anyway, and while I had no problems, she still had a greenish tinge next day in the face.
And I took drugs where many make alike an arch around these.
If I start to point out, there seem some dangers to something, I'm used to in Berlin being taken quite serious on this.
And not, that cancer danger warnings, death danger warnings, drug damage warnings, systems damage warnings, etc.,
are treated alike totally insignificant, and being censored off.
and not counter-proving the other's claim.
Posts: 1789 | From: Berlin | Registered: 12-04-02
Acid
Member
posted Jan 05, 2004 04:08 PM
Actually, this site scores among rock bottom sites, where it comes to danger warnings,
and censoring them out.
Where DHEA was made out alike something OK to stick into the "dietary" whatever, I warned, this stuff is not the most harmless,
to stick into the diatary whatever.
This warning was censored out again and again on this site.
Till I bothered to get me from the internet warnings against cancer dangers and other dangers.
Was it this site, who censored warnings contra Prozac, context killing?
If so, this site scored about as many negative gigapoints, as persons in context with Prozac warping into brain programs did kill.
(I read estimates ranging from ways over a thousand to many thousand death cases.)
I recall also censoring of warnings against various drug attacks into brain systems, that these might cause damages.
Actually, this is sure a difference of this site to what I'm used to from Berlin.
When I was younger, I dangled in about 10m hight at a building scaffold from one arm, for the mere adrenaline kick. Other times was on something high, where one step the wrong direction would have landed with falling dozens of meters.
I had it I warned someone food that for me would be OK might not for her, and she ate it anyway, and while I had no problems, she still had a greenish tinge next day in the face.
And I took drugs where many make alike an arch around these.
If I start to point out, there seem some dangers to something, I'm used to in Berlin being taken quite serious on this.
And not, that cancer danger warnings, death danger warnings, drug damage warnings, systems damage warnings, etc.,
are treated alike totally insignificant, and being censored off.
WY, YOU after all your ... into my direction, are just about the right one to teach about respect.
Apart from that I was originally writing towards Dr. Huang,
in case over all this censoring this was forgotten.
And after something I wrote to him (and not to some US American) someone asked "huh?"
I tried to explain simpler form, what I had written in response.
Next Morgan ranted off, and then came back some from me.
And there it drifted off.
This however does not change, that origincally it were concerns to do with that I believe with SCI sectors with still quite some latent healing potentials in them, E-OEG I think might disturb too far by their unnaturalness in systems, and hinder interreaction options from other systems into the damaged systems and majorly important repair programs.
And, though that was also censored out, as with CR seems obvious, sorts of repair might still start in time later, than the time where Cjo had this OP.
And in CR's case seemed to go further, than with E-OEG seemed to be that customary.
Who censored my opinions on this out, anyway?
You? In your usual style of not disproving in any form, in this case that E-OEG seem to hinder interphasings from medulla into SCI as seems important with latent healing capacities still left?
What makes you so sure, anyway, there were no latent healing capacities in Cjo's lower left SCI for example.
For my registration here, there were even several differing sorts.
Alike free selection, if preferring here from the self down aiming and upwards in, or from the brain stem down into there,
or from the self for an off-branch sorts of lower in there,
and trying to tune around for this one,
which also seemed to have some latent healing potentials ...
That's among what made Cjo's left in pic games entertaining to play around my tuning games and study various my ways about what interested me.
And whatever you ACID around, you have not proven me yet so far with all your censoring, that my opinions on something are incorrect.
And not just on this.
Maybe somewhen count, how many of my theories and opinions censored out
were not proven incorrect.
(Might that even be 100%? Anyway, the vast majority.)
You made it very long ago clear, that you censor based on belief ideology.
And not based on proven facts, that disprove my theories.
Also in this case, I saw no proof, that E-OEG can't have, like I commented, sorts of cellular defense systems active against the host, and can't be in any form, like I commented, in the way of natural programs interreaction options with C systems.
It is treated, when I warn Dr. Huang, it seems wrong to have done this procedure with Cjo's left SCI, and I assume generally with SCI this "young" and seeming to still have quite some latent partial healing capacities,
some "censorer object".
Why do you even pretend this is to address him.
That is the hight, to censor out writing of mine to him,
to next inform me, this site was for writing to him.
Hey, I tell what I think of your respect ideals in my direction:
I mentally spit on them.
A dictator Cure Censorer as you with your bloated arrogance,
rather risk "ignoring" it might not be just something here,
that since that OP a whole load of systems of mine cannot any longer activate patterings within such games after OP as before.
And among IMO such as I regarded among the most important,
if Cjo had been instead of my enemy my pal at the time,
as I'd have needed brain base natural interreactions options intact
that it can go for into the left SCI for this.
And yeah, you Contra Cure dude,
with your Cure Censoring,
can try to hide a long time, this alien cellular stuff with its defense systems is not in the way of natural healing options,
or that Cjo didn't have in there partial latent healing options before,
or that these olfactory whatevers are ever so natural to be in spine,
as not to disturb any natural programs options of interphasings into the C.
Try to hide it.
Censoring out my warnings to Dr. Huang,
and trying to hush it up what's not befitting your "discussion" ideals,
as if something written to Dr.Huang,
instead had in the headline, it was to you,
you Cure Censorer,
just befits you.
{IMO you and your site are outright dangerous for humans.
Having texts about differing potentially systems damaging methods,
and again and again censoring warnings contra dangers.
Potentially destructive attitudes disguised behind CC.)
Comment