Care Advocacy is Covered
I am dumb founded to a point at trying to understand why more sci people don't advocate for the cure.
Let's look at who's advocating on behalf of care.
The ILC industry, each state has at least a few Independent Living Centers, they have employees and board members. Each state has a Vocational Rehabilitation Agencey, board members. Each state has a SCIL State Council for Independent Living. I think that's just a few on state level.
http://www.ilru.org/html/publication...ory/index.html
National, NCIL, WID, NOD, NSCIA
Industry, wheel chair companies, medical supplies, pharma, health care
Publications, New Mobility, PN/Paraplegia News, ect.
I know I'm just touching the tip of the ice berg so feel free to add.
So I can't for the life of me understand the defence of foundations we thought were cure. ie CRF, MP, RHF.
I mean come on Care Advocacies ass is so covered it's unbelievable.
If every SCI person injured within the past 2 years went full force on cure, care would not be hurt in any way.
As a 25 year advocate for care I think we maybe and still do instill a feeling of fear in new sci. A fear that if they don't advocate care they will lose some thing and they won't be living a sci life as it should be according to history.
It pissed me off for a while when I first heard it but CR said the most true words I've ever heard, he said People are paralyzed because they choose to be.
Let's move forward and encourage people to do cure advocacy after sci, lets put our funds behind the REAL cure groups, lets get more involved, lets think long and hard on what life should be after a sci.
Should it be fixing it or surviving it.
I am dumb founded to a point at trying to understand why more sci people don't advocate for the cure.
Let's look at who's advocating on behalf of care.
The ILC industry, each state has at least a few Independent Living Centers, they have employees and board members. Each state has a Vocational Rehabilitation Agencey, board members. Each state has a SCIL State Council for Independent Living. I think that's just a few on state level.
http://www.ilru.org/html/publication...ory/index.html
National, NCIL, WID, NOD, NSCIA
Industry, wheel chair companies, medical supplies, pharma, health care
Publications, New Mobility, PN/Paraplegia News, ect.
I know I'm just touching the tip of the ice berg so feel free to add.
So I can't for the life of me understand the defence of foundations we thought were cure. ie CRF, MP, RHF.
I mean come on Care Advocacies ass is so covered it's unbelievable.
If every SCI person injured within the past 2 years went full force on cure, care would not be hurt in any way.
As a 25 year advocate for care I think we maybe and still do instill a feeling of fear in new sci. A fear that if they don't advocate care they will lose some thing and they won't be living a sci life as it should be according to history.
It pissed me off for a while when I first heard it but CR said the most true words I've ever heard, he said People are paralyzed because they choose to be.
Let's move forward and encourage people to do cure advocacy after sci, lets put our funds behind the REAL cure groups, lets get more involved, lets think long and hard on what life should be after a sci.
Should it be fixing it or surviving it.
Comment