Obviously just for the record everything has been tested on the rodents first and there has been improved function before even thinking about testing on humans.
If rodents are showing improvements there really is no excuses. Am I correct?
Wasn't there rumors a while ago that Dr.MCdonald was doing testing on monkeys in Columbia. I know he invited one of my friends to come down at some point, maybe a couple years ago...did this ever happen? I am just curious if anyone knows maybe Schmecky you remember?
I really don't want to steer off the subject of what's happening here I am just trying to establish fictitious from reality. I am confused if scientists say something if they actually just hype or do.
The NASCINet is the most tangible thing I have seen yet in the 3 years I have been injured.
There are a few known to exagerate or the trial went nowhere.
Last edited by c473s; 23 May 2009, 12:52 PM.
Reason: clarification
What benefits one, benefits all Leif.
Although we are separated by borders and ideologies, we are all one.
Paolo, you coming to Chicago?
Hello Jim,
I don't think I can make it, but I am trying to force Leif to do so, since he has a lot to say I am courious to see if he has the balls to go to W2W an say there in person what he writes.
Paolo
In God we trust; all others bring data. - Edwards Deming
We have changed the name of the network from the North American Spinal Cord Injury Network to "Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trial Network USA" or SCINetUSA.
I believe any medical center in the US is eligible to join SCINetUSA. There are presently about 9 centers interested in taking part. We hope to bring more centers on board in the US and expand so other countries can begin their own networks.
Comment