Dear all,
Just thought you might be able to help me understand the ASIA classifications. I saw you put the list up in Ian's thread, and I remembered a question I had about it.
I understand that for ASIA A, rectal sensation is the key determining factor.
But what I don't get is how the lack of rectal sensation can imply things about the entire cord below the level of injury.
The way I see it is that messages travel down the cord, and when they get to where they're going, they stop.
I would think that if messages are getting to, say, L5, wouldn't you be better off testing for sensation/movement near that area than at the very bottom of the cord?
How does testing for sensation/movement at the lowest section of the cord imply that no messages are getting below the level of injury?
Maybe I'm missing something.
Sincerely,
Dave
Just thought you might be able to help me understand the ASIA classifications. I saw you put the list up in Ian's thread, and I remembered a question I had about it.
I understand that for ASIA A, rectal sensation is the key determining factor.
But what I don't get is how the lack of rectal sensation can imply things about the entire cord below the level of injury.
The way I see it is that messages travel down the cord, and when they get to where they're going, they stop.
I would think that if messages are getting to, say, L5, wouldn't you be better off testing for sensation/movement near that area than at the very bottom of the cord?
How does testing for sensation/movement at the lowest section of the cord imply that no messages are getting below the level of injury?
Maybe I'm missing something.
Sincerely,
Dave
Comment