Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Icon Wheelchairs are now available for sale.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Dale, your suspension discussion got me thinking. . . that a titanium cantilevered frame may actually have some true integral suspension (albeit minor) because of the flexible, shock-absorbing properties of the metal. Comments?
    Chas
    TiLite TR3
    Dual-Axle TR3 with RioMobility DragonFly
    I am a person with mild/moderate hexaparesis (impaired movement in 4 limbs, head, & torso) caused by RRMS w/TM C7&T7 incomplete.

    "I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but what I don't think you realize is that what you heard is not what I meant."
    <
    UNKNOWN AUTHOR>

    Comment


      #47
      Originally posted by chasmengr View Post
      Dale, your suspension discussion got me thinking. . . that a titanium cantilevered frame may actually have some true integral suspension (albeit minor) because of the flexible, shock-absorbing properties of the metal. Comments?
      I tried TR, may be the frame was too rigid that I feel all the impact.

      Where else, for open titanium frame, not so much impact. As I observe, may be because the frame on front seat do flex, and do away with the impact.
      Life is meaningles, though you create the purpose.sigpic

      Comment


        #48
        Originally posted by totoL1 View Post
        I don`t have springs, and 100 year ago CF wasn`t exist, i remember you that you are not in a Hammer, so your teory of bounce is just a teory that is not really important for a fucking wheelchair.

        Anyway looks very clear that you and scott are going to work for Jeff, so you will have to speak about how fantastic is the Icon.

        I was speaking of leaf springs, not CF.

        A couple of points:

        First, I'm not involved with anyone's project, period. I paid retail for my Marvel, too, on purpose. I speak from a clear conscience. I have paid for every piece of equipment I own.

        You are the one with financial interests in the products you "review".
        You are the one with an external link to a site marketing a product you sell.
        You are the one who was given a set of wheels to 'review'.
        The list goes on.

        You need to check yourself, amigo. I have offered nothing offensive and only factual information and honest opinion.

        Sorry to have offended you, but your reaction speaks volumes. You are the one with interests to defend, obviously.
        "I have great faith in fools; self-confidence my friends call it." - Edgar Allen Poe

        "If you only know your side of an issue, you know nothing." -John Stuart Mill, On Liberty

        Comment


          #49
          Originally posted by totoL1 View Post
          ok, so speak about thing that you have tried, i could clean my arse with the teory.
          I guess you didn't read the paper I linked. Print it out and try wiping your arse with that. Read it first, though.
          "I have great faith in fools; self-confidence my friends call it." - Edgar Allen Poe

          "If you only know your side of an issue, you know nothing." -John Stuart Mill, On Liberty

          Comment


            #50
            @toto - One of the points you're making is something that both Christian and I value a lot - there are a lot of people who have done a lot of "trial and error" work to try new things - you're one of them, and there are many others.

            To be clear, -scott- is doing work for us, DaleB is not, although he has given us advice - we canvassed a lot of the people who bought our previous chair for their advice, and he was one of them.

            Both of them are right though - the CF seat that you developed are springs. Just because of the language barrier, I want to make sure that you understand that this is not an insult. Springs are fine sometimes, and seem like the most appropriate mechanical device for the problem you encountered.

            Your design parameters were very different from ours - you wanted a minimalist, light, custom configured way to keep your seat performing consistently (not loosening off like the straps did before Oracing corrected the problem) - you got a bit of spring return from the carbon fiber (which was the exact right material to use), which seemed like a nice additional benefit, and a bunch of other people took a look at it and thought that it would work for them too.

            But then you ran into a problem - the people who were asking for your help weren't the same size and weight as you, so you did the right thing - you told them that the solution worked for you, but that you had no idea how it would work for them - that they might need stiffer or thicker strips or different cutouts to get the spring effect they wanted. You warned them that they might spend money to buy the carbon and have it made, and that at the end of the day, it might work, or it might not.

            That's the difference between trial and error (again, which can be very valuable in research and development) and engineering. It's the difference between just having a theory and being able to prove it to a very high level of validation with a scientific test. We know exactly what's going to happen to our chair, and the person in it, because we've spent months doing tests.

            It's also the difference between custom and adjustable - custom (or semi-adjustable) is fine if you "nail it" (assuming that you in fact do know "exactly" what you need in terms of geometry), but if anything changes after that, you're looking at a rebuild - if you grow or shrink or run into a situation where you need to change your backrest or cushion - you're looking at a rebuild, or living with a change in geometry.

            Sometimes the only way to find out if something works is to build it (racing chairs and handcrank cycles often fall into this category), and people like Peterson and Schulte have been doing awesome design and fabrication for years on those products, but other times it's good to have science back things up.

            The Icon won't be for everyone - you clearly think that it's not for you, which is fine, and I appreciate you wishing us well. We also wish other chair companies well, because they deliver products to people who have other and specific requirements - I'm personally a really big fan of Oracing products, I'm actually trying to get a kneeler handcrank cycle from them (if you can put in a good word for me, I'd appreciate it).

            We're never going to try to get into the custom market - it's just not what we do, but there is a clear need for well made custom chairs and sports equipment, and I have a huge respect for the people who have done so much work to get people the equipment they need - Jim Knaub, Jim Martenson, Chris Peterson, Paul Schulte, Alan Ludovici, Marty Ball, Marilyn Hamilton...there's a huge list of people - some of them started off in their garages (again, not an insult - so did Apple).

            Having said that, the time for building things in garages is over, and good engineering is not "just theory" - it's science, and with all due respect, Toto, it absolutely is important for "fucking wheelchairs".

            I think way more important than it is for bikes or cars or inline skates and hockey sticks (all of which have gotten more engineering than wheelchairs historically).

            One of the things about Icon is that it's run by a couple of guys in wheelchairs, and what we want most of all is to see people in equipment that is best for them, so like last time, we'll sometimes tell people to go buy something else. We feel an enormous mantle of responsibility to not "hard sell" to the community that we're a part of, or push anyone into our equipment if there's something out there that will do them more good.

            One of the big errors that we want to avoid is trying to be all things for all people - we set pretty strict design parameters for ourselves this time around to try to keep everything as simple as possible for a chair that does so much.

            So this was a long reply to say something very simple - we're proud of the work we've done, we hope we're taking things to a new level, and also hope that we encourage and inspire other companies to do the same.

            We're not looking to pick fights nor do we need to "be right" - our solutions will work for some, but not all, and we're ok with that. We got to where we are by listening to people who use chairs, and know that we need to keep doing that if we want to be successful - and it's not just listening to the people who applaud, but maybe more important to listen to those who don't.
            Last edited by JeffAdams; 23 Jul 2011, 12:54 PM.

            Comment


              #51
              Originally posted by chasmengr View Post
              Dale, your suspension discussion got me thinking. . . that a titanium cantilevered frame may actually have some true integral suspension (albeit minor) because of the flexible, shock-absorbing properties of the metal. Comments?

              It may improve the feel of the ride. I've never been in a cantilever titanium frame for very long. A little smoothness goes a long way, IMo, which is why I like Froglegs, and the CF seat idea.
              "I have great faith in fools; self-confidence my friends call it." - Edgar Allen Poe

              "If you only know your side of an issue, you know nothing." -John Stuart Mill, On Liberty

              Comment


                #52
                Originally posted by DaleB View Post
                You are the one with financial interests in the products you "review".
                You are the one with an external link to a site marketing a product you sell.
                You are the one who was given a set of wheels to 'review'.
                The list goes on.

                You need to check yourself, amigo. I have offered nothing offensive and only factual information and honest opinion.

                Sorry to have offended you, but your reaction speaks volumes. You are the one with interests to defend, obviously.
                you didn`t offended me, we are just speaking about a suspension chair for a daily use, that`s all, and all that super teory take it to a wheelchair that almost all of them goes with antitips and all that shit just make me laught.

                So in US don`t think like others is offense them? no in Spain, sorry.

                But i`m going to tell you something to be clear, maybe i could have some intesesting financial, but not much, i`m just an Oracing`s friend that i only help them giving a push because i like and believe in what they do, they are just a few craftsmans that do everything by hand thinking in do the best for us, and i like that.

                Originally posted by Donno View Post
                How is you working for Oracing any different? I've seen no disrespect of you for touting their products. You need to give others the same treatment you have gotten.
                Sorry if i desrespect to some of you, wasn`t my intention.

                Comment


                  #53
                  Originally posted by chasmengr View Post
                  Dale, your suspension discussion got me thinking. . . that a titanium cantilevered frame may actually have some true integral suspension (albeit minor) because of the flexible, shock-absorbing properties of the metal. Comments?
                  I haven't tried a box frame, but my experience between my Quickie Ti, ZR, and my ZR2, I not so sure the cantilevered design really acts as a shock absorber. If anything i would say it just sends the vibrations throughout the chair. The ti has a lot "flex" and it vibrations would cause my legs to "bounce" and even sometimes spasm when going over cracks in sidewalkss and on rough surfaces. Even my ZR2 seems it must be made with thinner wall tubing than my ZR, because it has more flex and my legs get to bouncing on rougher surfaces. Now, I do think soft rolls and spinergy wheels help absorb some of the vibrations, as they are designed for, where as the stiffer wheels like my topolino or maybe dino's won't absorb the vibrations as much. Many complain about spinergy wheels and the "flex", but that is the design as they advertise and IMO, it helps absorb vibrations for a smoother ride.

                  Comment


                    #54
                    Now back to the thread, I would love to check out an Icon and maybe add to my collection.

                    Comment


                      #55
                      On a less fevered note: Jeff, what kind of wheels are on the Icon pictured way back in post #1? I thought you guys were going with Round Bettys.
                      stephen@bike-on.com

                      Comment


                        #56
                        We're going to be offering Spinergy, Round Betty, Topolino, and Sun as options, and will be compatible with all the usual suspects.

                        We're also recommending ADI as our back of choice, but will be compatible with Varilite, Roho, Jay etc.

                        We're working with ADI to provide their disc brake system, and (anticipating your next question) still up in the air with D's and Surelock - D's is unlikely as at last check, as Steve and HOC are doing design work for those who shall remain unnamed - which is fine, we have no problem with him doing job shop design work, but it really prevents us from putting his gear on our order form.

                        Comment


                          #57
                          Originally posted by JeffAdams View Post

                          We're working with ADI to provide their disc brake system, and (anticipating your next question) still up in the air with D's and Surelock - D's is unlikely as at last check, as Steve and HOC are doing design work for those who shall remain unnamed - which is fine, we have no problem with him doing job shop design work, but it really prevents us from putting his gear on our order form.
                          Just say it, it's just a name: Voldemort.
                          stephen@bike-on.com

                          Comment


                            #58
                            Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice....

                            Comment


                              #59
                              Originally posted by jschism View Post
                              . . . I not so sure the cantilevered design really acts as a shock absorber. If anything i would say it just sends the vibrations throughout the chair. The ti has a lot "flex" and it vibrations would cause my legs to "bounce" and even sometimes spasm when going over cracks in sidewalkss and on rough surfaces. Even my ZR2 seems it must be made with thinner wall tubing than my ZR, because it has more flex and my legs get to bouncing on rougher surfaces.
                              From your description, cantilevered titanium frames behave more like a spring than suspension. Thanks.

                              Originally posted by stephen212 View Post
                              Just say it, it's just a name: Voldemort.
                              Originally posted by JeffAdams View Post
                              Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice....
                              lol
                              Chas
                              TiLite TR3
                              Dual-Axle TR3 with RioMobility DragonFly
                              I am a person with mild/moderate hexaparesis (impaired movement in 4 limbs, head, & torso) caused by RRMS w/TM C7&T7 incomplete.

                              "I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but what I don't think you realize is that what you heard is not what I meant."
                              <
                              UNKNOWN AUTHOR>

                              Comment


                                #60
                                Originally posted by JeffAdams View Post


                                The Icon won't be for everyone - you clearly think that it's not for you, which is fine, and I appreciate you wishing us well. We also wish other chair companies well, because they deliver products to people who have other and specific requirements - I'm personally a really big fan of Oracing products, I'm actually trying to get a kneeler handcrank cycle from them (if you can put in a good word for me, I'd appreciate it).


                                We're not looking to pick fights .
                                Me either what i fight, and less with you, you are a great guy i think, not think the same about Dale and Scott, they are just looking for a free Icon .
                                kneeler hanbike? something like this? sorry i can`t show you the rest of the pic. I don`t think you need me for speak with Felip.

                                But i think your chair is a good option for a beginner in the sci world, with that tons of adjustaments, but after a few years seating in a wheelchair i don`t undertand guys who still need an adjustable one.

                                Here you can see the bounce of the CF strips, Oracing offer CF seat by strips like an option, so wide and thickness carbon fiber strips is not my problem, is their engineer problem.

                                But let speak only about your Icon: you like it? go for it, you don`t? buy another, that`s all.
                                Last edited by totoL1; 23 Jul 2011, 2:22 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X